Reference profile · Iraq · Utility IPP

25 MWp into a 132 kV ring. 22 years of cash.

A bifacial ground-mount IPP in Anbar Province delivers 51 GWh/yr modelled Year-1 generation under a 22-year PPA — engineered through 47 °C summer ambient, validated against a measured albedo, and over-delivering by +6.8% on the SAM baseline.

Location  Anbar Province, Iraq Topology  Grid-tied utility · 132 kV Capacity  25 MWp DC · 22 MW AC Reference profile  v1 · 2026
0MWp
DC array
Bifacial · 5 × 5 MWp blocks
0MW
AC export
DC : AC ratio 1.14 · 132 kV grid
0GWh / yr
Year-1 yield
~2,040 kWh/kWp · NASA POWER calibrated
+0%
Bifacial gain
Over SAM monofacial baseline
0years
PPA term
USD-indexed · take-or-pay
The challenge

High irradiance, high heat, high soiling — and one substation slot.

Anbar's solar resource is exceptional — 2,200 kWh/m²/yr GHI at 33°N, peaking above 8 kWh/m²/day in July. That is the easy part of the brief. The hard part is everything that gets in the way of capturing it: 47 °C ambient summer peaks that drive temperature de-rating to the inverter clipping point, dust storms that re-soil the array within hours, and a 1.4 g/m²/day average soiling rate across the dry season.

The IPP commercial structure compounded the engineering brief: a single substation interconnection slot booked in a 32-month delivery window, USD-indexed PPA tariff with a 22-year term, and lender sensitivity to the P50–P90 generation gap of less than 8%. Underbuild against the substation slot meant stranded capacity for 22 years; overbuild meant clipping a high-tariff curtailment loss.

The asset was scoped to the substation, not the field. That choice cascaded into every downstream design decision — module choice, tracker-vs-fixed, string-vs-central — each evaluated against a single criterion: what gets the most energy through that 22 MW interconnection over 22 years?

Site & resource baseline

  • Latitude: 33° N · Anbar Province, Iraq
  • GHI: 2,200 kWh/m²/yr (NASA POWER)
  • DNI: 2,520 kWh/m²/yr
  • Ambient peak: 47 °C summer · −2 °C winter
  • Soiling: 1.4 g/m²/day dry-season average
  • Measured albedo: 0.32 (compacted desert)
  • PPA: 22-year USD-indexed take-or-pay
  • Interconnection: single 22 MW slot · 132 kV
The approach

Optimise for energy through a fixed AC port, not for nameplate.

A 25 MWp DC array against a 22 MW AC export gives a 1.14 oversize ratio — modest by tropical-utility standards (1.20–1.35) but deliberate. Anbar's near-vertical irradiance profile means clipping losses scale fast above 1.15 oversize at this latitude. The energy yield curve was solved per-decision against the 22 MW AC ceiling, not the 25 MWp DC nameplate.

Three engineering decisions diverge from a typical 25 MWp utility template:

  1. 1Fixed-tilt 25° over single-axis trackers. Trackers add ~14% yield at this latitude but introduce moving parts, motor failures, and dust-ingress maintenance load through 22 PPA years. Fixed-tilt + bifacial gain (+6.8% measured albedo) closed the gap to ~7% pre-O&M, ~11% post-O&M cost — and removed every tracker-class lender sensitivity from the financial model.
  2. 2String inverters on MVPS skids over central inverters. Five 5-MWp blocks each feed a Modular MV Power Station (MVPS) skid with eight 250 kW string inverters and a 5 MVA pad-mount 33 kV transformer. Single-string failure costs a string-day, not a block-week. MVPS skid pre-fab in China collapsed site civil & assembly time by ~11 weeks against the central-inverter alternative.
  3. 3Robotic dry cleaning, no water trucks. Anbar dry-season soiling at 1.4 g/m²/day costs ~7.2% annualised yield without intervention. Wet cleaning was ruled out — water sourcing in-country adds OpEx volatility and demineralised-water spec compliance is hard at scale. Autonomous robotic dry-brush units, one per row, run a nightly cycle. Capital ~+1.8% on EPC, recurring OpEx flat through 22 years.
System architecture

Single-line view: array → MVPS → 33 kV ring → grid.

Five 5-MWp blocks feed pad-mounted MVPS skids on a 33 kV collector ring, terminating at a 25 MVA grid step-up substation and the 132 kV utility tie. The collector ring topology gives single-fault recoverability — any one MVPS can be isolated without dropping the rest of the plant.

Block 1 · 5 MWp Block 2 · 5 MWp Block 3 · 5 MWp Block 4 · 5 MWp Block 5 · 5 MWp Bifacial PV array 25 MWp · fixed-tilt 25° DC 1500 V 8 × 250 kW 5 MVA 33 kV xfmr MVPS skid Pre-fab · 5 × per plant 33 kV 33 kV ring + RMUs Single-fault recoverable Step-up GIS 25 MVA · 33 / 132 kV 132 kV Utility tie Robotic dry cleaning 1 unit / row · nightly cycle SCADA + plant controller Reactive power · grid code compliant
PV generation (DC)
MV / HV power equipment
Power conversion (AC)
Auxiliary systems
Bill of materials

Indicative equipment stack.

Component selection is illustrative — final BoM in any binding TPC delivery is calibrated to grid-code, lender bankability list, and utility interconnection conditions current at financial close. Primary equipment ships factory-direct; site civils and HV scope are procured locally under TPC engineering supervision.

ComponentSpecificationQtySource
PV moduleN-Type TOPCon bifacial double-glass · 580 W · 144-cell · IEC 61215 / 61730 / 62804 (PID)43,103Factory-direct
Mounting structureHot-dip galvanised steel, fixed-tilt 25°, 1.0 m chord clearance, IEC 61400 wind-load certified to 160 km/h2,400 setsFactory-direct
Driven pile foundationC-section galvanised, 3.5 m, geotech-tested embedment for compacted desert soil9,600Site-procured
String inverter1500 V DC · 250 kW · IEC 62109 · IEC 61727 · IP66 · −25 to +60 °C88Factory-direct
MVPS skid (modular MV station)Pre-fab skid: 8 × string inverter mount, 5 MVA dry-type 33 kV pad-mount transformer, MV switchgear, auxiliary AC/DC5Factory-direct
33 kV ring main unit (RMU)SF6-free vacuum-break · IEC 62271-200 · 24 / 36 kV · 630 A bus7Factory-direct
Step-up substation25 MVA ONAN 33/132 kV · GIS switchgear · IEC 60076 / 62271 · grid-code reactive power1Factory-direct
Plant controller / SCADAIEC 61850 · grid-code Q at night, P/F droop, weather station integration, lender-grade reporting1Factory-direct
Robotic dry cleaningAutonomous dry-brush units, solar-charged, one per array row, nightly cycle, IoT telemetry320Factory-direct
DC combiner / SPDs1500 V Type II surge arresters, fused string combiners704Factory-direct
HV / MV cabling33 kV XLPE armoured collector cable; 1500 V DC PV string cable; LV armoured AS/NZS 1429 / IEC 60502~52 kmSite-procured
Civil & securityBulk earthworks, perimeter fence with thermal CCTV, gravel access road, control building, 25 MVA pad1 lotSite-procured
Lender's engineer scopeIndependent technical due diligence — design review, P50/P90 yield, EPC contract review, PR test plan1 packageOwner-engaged
Commissioning & performance testFactory acceptance + site acceptance + grid-code witness test + 7-day capacity test + IEC 61724 PR test1 packageTPC engineering
Year-1 generation

Modelled monthly yield, calibrated to NASA POWER Anbar data.

Monthly generation is computed from public NASA POWER irradiance for 33°N Anbar Province, applied to the as-designed array spec at PR 0.78 with a measured-albedo bifacial gain of 1.07. Hover any bar for the underlying figure.

Monthly generation — Year 1 (modelled)

Annual total: 51.0 GWh · ~2,040 kWh/kWp · PR 0.78 · bifacial 1.07
Jan · 3.43 GWh
Feb · 3.62 GWh
Mar · 4.51 GWh
Apr · 4.92 GWh
May · 5.21 GWh
Jun · 5.38 GWh
Jul · 5.44 GWh
Aug · 5.31 GWh
Sep · 4.78 GWh
Oct · 4.18 GWh
Nov · 3.45 GWh
Dec · 3.11 GWh
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec

Summer plateau (Jun–Aug) sits at ~5.3–5.4 GWh/month, brushing AC clipping for ~2.4% of annual energy at the chosen 1.14 oversize ratio. The +6.8% measured bifacial gain over the SAM monofacial baseline is the difference between the financial model's P50 and the as-built Year-1 production budget. Annual yield of ~2,040 kWh/kWp is consistent with NASA POWER reference data for fixed-tilt utility installations at 33°N latitude.

Lessons learned

Three engineering insights worth carrying forward.

01 / SITE DATA

Measure albedo before the lender models it.

Default SAM albedo of 0.20 understated Anbar's compacted-desert reality (0.32 measured) by ~12 percentage points of bifacial gain factor. A two-week pyranometer-pair calibration campaign on the substation pad pre-construction moved the lender's P50 yield up by 2.1% — that single line item paid for itself ~340× over the PPA term.

02 / SCHEDULE

Substation drives commercial operation date — design back from there.

The 132 kV step-up GIS substation has a 14-month order-to-delivery window through standard supply chains. PV blocks can be re-stacked in weeks; the substation cannot. In an IPP schedule with a punitive late-COD penalty, the substation order is committed before the EPC contract is awarded — and the rest of the BoM is sequenced backwards from substation energisation, not forward from notice-to-proceed.

03 / O&M

Robotic dry cleaning trades capex once for OpEx volatility forever.

Wet cleaning at this site would have required 18,000 L/day of demineralised water through the dry season — a recurring OpEx exposure to in-country water sourcing and quality. The +1.8% capex premium for one robotic unit per row converts that exposure into a fixed schedule, with telemetry to lender's engineer dashboards. Over 22 PPA years the IRR delta on robotic-vs-wet is ~+0.4 ppt.

The lender's engineer asked us one question every month for the first year: "is the plant tracking the model?" The answer kept being yes — and then in month nine it was yes plus 6.8%. That's the bifacial gain showing up because we measured the albedo instead of guessing it. The other 22 years of this PPA are a bonus on a base case that already cleared the financial model.
Project director · utility-IPP delivery · TPC engineering

Quote is illustrative of the engineering posture TPC brings to utility-scale IPP engagements. This reference profile is not tied to a named or contracted client; site-specific testimonials are released only with the operator's signed consent under the engagement NDA.

Reference profile. This page describes a typical engagement scope, equipment stack and modelled outcome representative of TPC's utility-scale IPP delivery in the MENA region — not a specific contracted client project. Generation figures are computed from public NASA POWER solar irradiance data for the Anbar / 33°N zone applied to the equipment specification described above, with bifacial gain calibrated to a representative measured albedo. Final pricing, system size, and delivered yield in any binding TPC engagement depend on grid-code, geotechnical investigation, utility interconnection conditions, and the bankability list current at financial close.

Working on a similar engagement?

Utility-scale IPP, MENA grid-tied PV, or bifacial ground-mount with PPA financing — TPC's engineering team will scope the same equipment envelope for your project under a one-business-day SLA.